What is review gating, and why does it get sellers banned?
It sounds like sensible customer service. It is the single fastest way to lose a selling account, and a lot of insert tools are built around it.
Last updated
Review gating is asking a customer how happy they are, and then showing them a different next step depending on what they said. Score it highly and you get the review page. Score it poorly and you get a private complaints form that nobody else ever sees.
Why it is tempting
Because the first version of the argument sounds responsible. You are catching problems before they become public. You are giving an unhappy customer a route to a refund instead of a rant. Nobody set out to commit fraud; they set out to do customer service and reached for the nearest tool.
And it works, in the narrow sense. Ratings go up. That is exactly the problem.
Why it is prohibited
A star rating is supposed to be a sample of what customers think. Gating makes it a sample of what your happiest customers think, while still presenting it as the former. Every platform that hosts reviews treats this as manipulation:
- Amazon forbids any attempt to influence reviews, and selectively soliciting positive ones falls squarely inside that.
- Google prohibits review gating by name in its contributed-content policy.
- Trustpilot requires that invitations go to customers without regard to their likely opinion.
- The FTC has taken enforcement action against companies that suppressed negative reviews, which makes this a legal exposure in the US, not only a policy one.
How to spot it in a tool you are paying for
Vendors rarely use the phrase. They describe the mechanism as a benefit. Treat all of these as the same thing:
- “Intercept unhappy customers before they review.”
- “Route 4- and 5-star customers to Amazon.”
- “Negative feedback goes straight to your inbox instead.”
- Any threshold setting that decides who is shown the review link.
If there is a satisfaction question on screen one and the destination on screen two depends on the answer, the tool gates reviews, whatever the marketing page calls it.
What to do instead
You do not have to choose between catching problems and staying compliant. You can do both — you simply cannot use the answer to decide who sees the review link.
- Show everyone the same screen. Review links and your contact address together, for every customer, regardless of what they scored.
- Ask your questions first, and act on them privately. A survey tells you the handle snapped on three orders this month. That is the fix, and it is worth more than the one review you might have suppressed.
- Read the distribution, not an average. Five 1s and five 5s average to a 3, and so do ten 3s. Those are completely different businesses.
Questions
What is review gating?
Asking a customer how satisfied they are, then showing different next steps depending on the answer: the public review page for happy customers, a private feedback form for unhappy ones. The result is a rating that reflects a filter rather than the customers.
Is review gating illegal or just against policy?
Both, depending on where you are. Amazon, Google and Trustpilot all prohibit it in their terms. In the United States the FTC has also acted against businesses that suppressed negative reviews.
How do I tell if my insert tool does review gating?
Look for a satisfaction question on the first screen followed by different destinations. If the tool advertises "filter out negative reviews", "catch unhappy customers first", or a threshold setting such as "send 4 stars and above to Amazon", that is review gating described in marketing language.
Is asking for feedback before a review the same as review gating?
Only if the answer changes what happens next. Asking everyone a question and then showing everyone the same review links is not gating. Asking a question and using the answer to decide who sees the review link is.
Does review gating apply to Google reviews too?
Yes. Google prohibits it by name in its contributed-content policy, and it applies to Google Business Profile reviews just as it does to marketplace reviews.
What happens if I have been gating reviews already?
Stop, and change the flow so every customer sees the same path. Reviews already collected are not retroactively removed as a rule, but continuing after you know is the part that turns a mistake into a pattern.
Monact is built so this is not a choice you have to keep making — see how we stay compliant.
Feedback and reviews, without the gate
Every buyer sees the same screens in the same order. There is no rule in the product that can read an answer and change what comes next.